The Museum of Modern Art in Vienna shows ‘ Bad Painting / Good Art ‘
August 30, 2008

Vienna, Austria - The Museum of Modern Art in Vienna shows “Bad painting” is the critique of painting expressed with its own most essential means: Many of the most important painters of the 20th century like Francis Picabia, René Magritte, Asger Jorn, Philip Guston, Neil Jenney, Georg Baselitz, Albert Oehlen or Julian Schnabel radically called their medium into question using different strategies of incorrect, faulty, ugly or angry painting in order to open up new possibilities for the medium. Using prominent works by 21 artists, the exhibition presents “bad painting” as a phenomenon which opens a new and differentiated perspective on the history of painting since the beginning of modernism which today still influences contemporary discourse.
Painting as a Strategy of Protest
“Bad painters” are nonetheless avowed and steadfast adherents of the medium. They ascribe a critical potential to painting through both turning against the canon of the traditionalists and the dogmatic rules and ideals of the avant-garde. Along these lines, “bad painting” is a critique of modernist utopias and their untenable claims and promises. As an instance of opposition, the strategy of “bad painting”
did not define the entire oeuvre of the respective artists but rather shaped certain phases in their production.
Against the dogmas of classical modernity
Already in the 1920s, Francis Picabia propagated a pluralism and change in styles as an alternative to the avant-gardist belief in linear progress and innovation. Since the end of the 1980s, Picabia has been celebrated as the father-figure of bad painting. In protest against the dogmatism of his Surrealist colleagues. Towards the end of the 1950s, Asger Jorn found in his modifications – painting over pictures bought at flea markets – a way of recognizing the value of kitsch, which he referred to as “bad painting.” “Personally, I like bad better than good.”
Painting against the aversion to painting
Ideological conflicts between abstraction and figuration, along with the aversion to painting by new forces in the avant-garde compelled the “bad painters” to take clear positions in the 1960s and 1970s: Georg Baselitz took “manure, mud and non-colors […] to paint really bad paintings” in order to “establish something against all of the beautiful things […] aggressively and with a fierce contradiction.”
Sigmar Polke formulated his criticism in painting taking issue with the ideological weightiness of the vocabulary of modernism, also working with the phenomenon of kitsch. In America of the late 1960s, Philip Guston turned away from abstract expressionism towards his own idiosyncratic paintings. Today these paintings, which during his lifetime were only met with incomprehension, constitute an important position in “bad painting.” Around 1969/70, Neil Jenney produced a series of paintings which he entitled “Bad” or “Unconcerned Paintings” which he soon discontinued. He knew that even if he “produced the worst possible paintings, these would never be good enough.”

Bad Painting during the painting-hype in the 1980s
Following along the lines of the deconstructive approach of postmodernity, “bad painting” would flourish during the 1980s. Artists such as Albert Oehlen, Martin Kippenberger or Werner Büttner would produce a radical examination of the medium and its possible effectiveness. With their relentless and unsparing critique, they fought against the omnipresent “good painting” that at the time was
booming. The American Julian Schnabel’s refusal to limit himself to a specific style can also be understood in this same spirit of rejecting any kind of rules or commitments. René Magritte moved away from his signature style – if only for a short time. The paintings from his “période vache” (1948) “run through” the formal and intellectual repertoire of modernist painting in a satirical way.
The exhibition leads up to current “bad painting” positions, including John Currin and Lisa Yuskavage. They assail the American canon of values of decency, decorum, “good taste” and beauty in a way which is often condemned as shocking, sensationalist, “politically incorrect” and “reactionary.” Among other things, they work with painting techniques of the old masters in order to criticize the medium and through this to breathe new life into it.
Bookmark and Share This Page
If you like this then please subscribe to the RSS Feed.The Forest of Fontainebleau ~ Painters & Photographers from Corot to Monet
July 21, 2008

HOUSTON, TX.- Inspired by the possibilities of painting in nature, rather than in the studio, artists traveled to the rugged Forest of Fontainebleau near Paris from the early 1820s to the mid-1870s forging innovations in art that would resonate for generations to follow. There, among the rural villages and the vast and varied wilderness, they laid the groundwork for Impressionism, influenced the development of landscape photography, and raised early advocacy for nature conservancy. In the Forest of Fontainebleau: Painters and Photographers from Corot to Monet at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. The exhibition of 96 works will be on view through October 19.
Organized by the National Gallery of Art in association with the MFAH, the show is the first U.S. exhibition to trace the dual evolution of landscape painting and photography at Fontainebleau. It features multiple works by Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot and Claude Monet, the artists who represent the ends of the experimental spectrum at Fontainebleau, and also highlights works by Jean-François Millet and Théodore Rousseau, who were among the most diligent students of the forest and eventually made it their permanent home. Other featured artists include Frédéric Bazille, Narcisse Diaz de la Peña, Auguste Renoir, and Alfred Sisley. Among the nine photographers represented are such pioneers of the field as Gustave Le Gray, Eugène Cuvelier, and Charles Famin.
“In the Forest of Fontainebleau celebrates a crucial, fertile period in art history,” said Aurisch. “Although the Impressionists are often credited with the innovation of painting outdoors directly in front of the motif, this exhibition wants to set the record straight by documenting the achievements of the earlier group of painters, who passed on their hard-earned experience to the young painters of Monet´s generation.”
The Forest
The Forest of Fontainebleau is located about 35 miles southeast of Paris. At about 50,000 acres, it is not only France´s largest forest, but its most topographically diverse with dramatic stands of
centuries-old oak trees, rocky plateaus and gorges, and desolate, arid spaces. Corot was among the first artists to begin making regular visits to the forest in the early 1820s. Others soon joined him in experimenting with open-air painting and the challenge of capturing light, shadow, weather, and seasons in this “natural studio.” Those years quietly marked the beginning of a revolution in landscape painting in France that would spread throughout Europe and the United States.
By the 1830s, an informal artists´ colony was established in Barbizon, one of several villages situated along the perimeter of the forest, favored because it had the best accommodations. The artists who stayed at the inns there and embraced plein-air painting gave rise to the art movement known as the Barbizon School. Among the other villages first frequented by artists were Chailly and Marlotte. All offered easy access into the forest, but most artists didn´t venture too far into the wilderness because of the supplies they had to transport on their backs: typically, an umbrella, a folding easel, stool, paint boxes, and a canvas.
Photographers began making pilgrimages to Fontainebleau in the 1840s when the introduction of the paper negative process made it possible to travel without heavy equipment. They were working side-by-side with painters as early as 1849, contributing to the camaraderie and exchange of ideas. During this period, France surpassed Italy as the pre-eminent center for plein-air painting because of the activity at Fontainebleau, and landscape photography became an art.
The forest´s attraction for artists began to decline in the 1870s, but the artists working there then were already carrying out the experiments in painting outdoors that would lead to another revolution in art: Impressionism.
The Exhibition
The exhibition will be installed in sections, each devoted to an aspect of the forest and its role in the development of naturalistic landscape painting and landscape photography: Discovery of the Forest; Trees and Rocks; Nature and Observation; Fontainebleau on a Grand Scale; and Village Life. More than 56 private and institutional lenders contributed works to the show, including the MFAH. The museum´s Great Oaks of the Vieux Bas-Bréau (1864) by Rousseau, Gustave Courbet´s Gust of Wind (1865), and two photographs by Le Gray, Tree, Forest of Fontainebleau (c. 1856) and Le Pavé de Chailly (1852) are among the highlights.
•Discovery of the Forest
Corot had been to the forest before his 1825 trip to Italy where he practiced painting outdoors. He returned to France with a new appreciation for the wonders of the forest and continued to work there for five decades. The exhibition includes seven paintings by Corot ranging from 1822´s Study of a Tree Trunk in the Forest of Fontainebleau to 1872´s Woodcutters in a Forest Valley. Le Gray was among the first photographers to visit the forest, creating salted paper prints from paper negatives in the fall of 1849. The exhibition also includes seven works by Le Gray that demonstrate his painterly achievement in capturing the light, textures, and atmosphere of the forest.
•Nature and Observation
Artists who made regular trips to forest, and those who lived there, like Rousseau, were obsessed with capturing its many moods exposed in different seasons, in different weather, at different times of the day. Examples include Rousseau´s red-toned Sunset over the Sands of Jean de Paris (1864), De la Peña´s foreboding The Storm (1871), and Cuvelier´s Pathway in the Forest of Fontainebleau in the Snow (early 1860s).
•Fontainebleau on a Grand Scale
Because artists had to carry their supplies into the forest, they often worked on portable-size canvases. However, the forest also served as an inspiration for large-scale works completed in the studio after studies done outdoors. Courbet´s monumental Gust of Wind is one example. At more than seven-feet-wide, the painting is a fantasy scene combining elements from several sketches the artist made in the forest.
Visit : the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston at : www.mfah.org/
Source: www.artknowledgenews.com
Bookmark and Share This Page
If you like this then please subscribe to the RSS Feed.The British Museum Exhibition presents Hadrian ~ Empire & Conflict
July 20, 2008

LONDON - The British Museum presents Hadrian: Empire and Conflict, on view through October 26, 2008. The Roman Emperor Hadrian (117 to 138 AD) is best known for his passion for Greek culture, interest in architecture, his love for Antinous, and of course the eponymous wall he built between England and Scotland, then Caledonia. This exhibition will look beyond this established image and offer new perspectives on his life and legacy, exploring the sharp contradictions of his personality and his role as a ruthless military commander.
Incorporating recent scholarship and the latest spectacular archaeological discoveries, the exhibition will feature over 180 objects from 28 lenders from Italy to Georgia, from Israel to Newcastle. Loans of dramatic sculpture, exquisite bronzes and architectural fragments will be brought together and displayed for the first time in the UK, alongside famous objects from the Museum’s own collection such as the iconic bronze head of Hadrian and the Vindolanda tablets. This exhibition will be held in the Round Reading Room, often compared to one of Hadrian’s architectural masterpieces, the Pantheon in Rome.
Hadrian’s family were originally from Spain. As the Roman Empire expanded and became more diverse in the 1st and 2nd century AD it became possible for people outside the traditional elite to come to power. Hadrian was adopted by his predecessor Trajan, also a Spaniard, on his deathbed. By the time of Hadrian’s accession, the Roman Empire covered much of Europe, northern Africa and the Middle East. But Hadrian recognized imperial overstretch and acted quickly to re-draw the empire’s borders, to consolidate and strengthen rather than continuing the expansive campaigns of his predecessor. His first act on coming to power was to withdraw the Roman forces from Mesopotamia, present- day Iraq. Another example of this consolidation was the wall he had built in the north of England to mark the furthest reach of his empire. Hadrian was remarkable in that he travelled extensively across his empire, meeting more of his people than any other emperor before him.
Hadrian was a man of great contradiction in both his personality and reign: a military man and homosexual, he combined ruthless suppression of dissent with cultural tolerance. He reacted with great ferocity against the Jewish Revolt in 132 AD (examples of poignant objects belonging to Jewish rebels hiding in caves near Jerusalem will be included in the exhibition), but he was also a dedicated philhellene, passionate about Greek culture. He took a young Greek male lover, Antinous, who accompanied him on his travels around the empire. In AD 130, Antinous drowned in mysterious circumstances in Egypt. Consumed by grief, Hadrian founded a new city, Antinoupolis, close to the spot where he died and had Antinous declared a god, linked to the Egyptian deity Osiris. A cult of Antinous-Osiris sprang up resulting in statues, busts and silverware featuring the image of the newly deified youth.
A central theme of Hadrian’s life and his legacy can be found in his strong personal interest in architecture. Under his patronage, highly innovative, iconic buildings were constructed throughout the empire and form a major part of his legacy. The most famous are the Pantheon in Rome and his magnificent residence at Tivoli, a few miles east of the capital. The villa was like a small city, the empire in miniature. It evoked famous sites in Greece and Egypt and was a playground for new architecture, filled with exquisite works of art. The villa is still being excavated and exciting new finds and research will be presented in the exhibition.
Thorsten Opper, curator of the exhibition said: “This will be a unique opportunity to see important objects related to Hadrian in one exhibition. Hadrian was an extremely successful emperor who left an immense and enduring legacy, but one that is often not recognized or appreciated. This exhibition will allow for a reassessment of his character, his life, love and legacy”.
Visit : www.britishmuseum.org/default.aspx
Source: www.artknowledgenews.com


Save to Browser Favorites
Ask
backflip
blinklist
BlogBookmark
Bloglines
BlogMarks
Blogsvine
BuddyMarks
BUMPzee!
CiteULike
co.mments
Connotea
del.icio.us
DotNetKicks
Digg
diigo
dropjack.com
dzone
Facebook
Fark
Faves
Feed Me Links
Friendsite
folkd.com
Furl
Google
Hugg
Jeqq
Kaboodle
kirtsy
linkaGoGo
LinksMarker
Ma.gnolia
Mister Wong
Mixx
MySpace
MyWeb
Netvouz
Newsvine
PlugIM
popcurrent
Propeller
Reddit
Rojo
Segnalo
Shoutwire
Simpy
Slashdot
Sphere
Sphinn
Spurl.net
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Technorati
ThisNext
Webride
Windows Live
Yahoo!
Email This to a Friend